Challenging court rulings by way of objection by others Outside the rivalry "a comparative analytical study"

Abstract

Judicial judgments are based on the basic assumption that judgments are the title of the truth, but the control of such presumption is not hidden,  may be the judgment is not right with respect to litigants in terms of factual evidence or legal authority, and infringing to the non- litigants in the claim and violating their rights. Therefore, appealing by way of objection with respect to others was the legal means available to him to request the judiciary to reconsider the litigation to the extent that the judgment affects or infringes on his rights. Because the litigation lapses between the parties to the case with the judgment issued by the court, so it would be logical to give the third party out of the litigation the right to appeal the ruling affecting his rights or the infringer.